US versus China the economic model

Economy 09:54 16.11.2018

With the US-China economic rivalry intensifying and “decoupling” becoming the mantra in Washington, what mindset, or economic model, is behind President Donald Trump’s response to China?

Trump is a Republican, but not as we know them. Republicans favour free international trade, markets, and small government. Recall Ronald Regan’s “the nine most terrifying words are I’m from the government and I’m here to help”.

Trump’s eagerness for a tariff-driven trade war departs from this orthodoxy. Peter Navarro, Trump’s self-styled chief economist, put this in a wider context in his recent CSIS speech: “Economic security as national security.” These are two interwoven (and confounded) themes: first, that America’s trading partners, especially China, have not played by the rules of international trade; and second, that the globalised world has undermined America’s security readiness.

Let’s look at unfair trade practices first. Navarro genuflects to the standard Ricardian model of international trade. He echoes Trump’s assertion that his ultimate aim is a world with zero tariffs. He would have us believe that Trump’s tariffs are a means to an end: a bargaining chip to correct foreigners’ unfair trade practices.

Fair enough, but Navarro’s view of what is unfair is wide-ranging. Trade and foreign investment rules should be reciprocal. America’s intellectual property (IP) rules should apply to everyone. Bilateral trade should be balanced (i.e. little or no net capital flows). Trade deficits are “giving away wealth”.  

In Republican doctrine and conventional economics, these “unfair” tactics should actually have held China back: tariffs, industry protection, a distorted exchange rate, bureaucrat-run enterprises, financial subsidies, central planning, excessive regulation, and pervasive government interference should all weaken the economy. But Trump is not waiting until the China model fails or mutates. He wants to discipline it through a tariff war.

The second concern is the threat to American security preparedness from globalisation. China uses state-controlled industry policy to strengthen its defence security, while offshoring, foreign investment, and international supply chains have undercut American self-sufficiency in vital security industries and allowed vital IP to leak to potential enemies.

Navarro’s answer to China’s strategic industry policy is for America to adopt the same planned strategic industrial policy, “on-shoring” vital production. This is not just a temporary bargaining instrument. But it falls far short of “decoupling”.

READ: China makes opening bid to US on trade ahead of Trump-Xi meeting

All this could be fairly benign. Trade agreements could be renegotiated, like the NAFTA and the US-Korea agreement have been tweaked – adversely, in the view of many economic commentators, but not disastrously, as some had feared. In the process, some tariff barriers might actually fall – Europe has already shown readiness to reduce its auto-tariffs.

Security self-sufficiency (if “security” is narrowly defined) has often been an objective of governments, including Australia. For a large diverse economy such as the US, the cost in terms of trade-diversion and resource maldistribution may not be too great.

There is, however, a less benign outcome. If the objective is to inflict maximum damage on China, in the hope of significantly slowing its technological advance and the near-inevitable of China’s GDP exceeding Americas within a decade, then this seems both futile and potentially hugely damaging. Permanent measures invite retaliatory chain-reactions. In addition to the damage which conventional economics predicts, this policy rules out possibilities of compromise and cooperation, not only on security issues but on global public goods currently provided by international agencies such as the UN, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and World Trade Organisation. Global-wide problems such as climate change go unaddressed.

There would be more confidence in the benign outcome if Trump’s economic mindset were less confused. If Trump the dealmaker wants to use America’s heft to arm-wrestle European trade protection down and make China pay more for their IP (in 2017, they paid a not-inconsiderable $29 billion), then his confusions about bilateral trade balances, his preference for bilateral deals over multilateral, and his spurious security grounds for tariffs might not matter too much, provided other nations can maintain their multilateral focus.

By the same token, concerted policy measures to achieve greater self-sufficiency in security-vital industries may be a sensible precaution in an uncertain world, even if it offends Republican beliefs about the government’s role. Of course, America should vigorously protect its security secrets.

But it would be over-reach for Trump to see China’s detailed planning for technological progress as somehow an illegitimate product of an authoritarian system. It was Eisenhower who first fretted about the American “military-industrial complex”.

China’s sin is not its economic model. After all, China’s protectionist development model just follows in the footsteps of Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea. Successful Singapore might be seen as the exemplar for China – free-riding on the opportunities provided by globalization, attracting foreign investment through discriminatory taxes, with a government vigorously pursuing a self-interested industry strategy designed to attract strategic industries which make it stronger, more secure, and richer.

There are two key differences: scale and policy intent. Singapore has neither the capacity nor the desire to dominate the world. But if Trump is to achieve the benign outcome and develop an effective strategy in response to China’s rise, he needs greater clarity of objectives, effective instruments, and an understanding of economics which goes beyond the “art of the deal”.

IEPF issued a statement regarding Azerbaijani children at the UN Human Rights Council

News line

Pentagon confirms US plans to send additional 'defensive weapons' to Kiev
12:15 08.07.2025
Trump sets 25% tariffs on Japan and South Korea
12:00 08.07.2025
Israeli army says 5 soldiers killed, 14 injured in northern Gaza
11:45 08.07.2025
Brazil’s president sounds alarm over multilateralism crisis, condemns Gaza genocide at BRICS summit
11:30 08.07.2025
Protest Held in London Backing Pro-Palestine March Organizers Accused of Offences
11:15 08.07.2025
Japan to make diplomatic efforts to ensure implementation of Israel-Iran ceasefire: Top diplomat
11:00 08.07.2025
Trump Holds Talks with Netanyahu at the White House
10:45 08.07.2025
Trump says US has 'scheduled Iran talks'
10:30 08.07.2025
Trump says US will supply weapons to Ukraine
10:15 08.07.2025
Priorities of Azerbaijan's international development policy discussed
10:00 08.07.2025
US to impose 25% duties on imports from Kazakhstan from August
09:45 08.07.2025
Plans for border delimitation, demarcation with Armenia discussed in Baku
09:30 08.07.2025
Israel wants to coordinate with US on possibility of new strikes on Iran
09:15 08.07.2025
Netanyahu nominates Trump for Nobel Peace Prize
09:00 08.07.2025
Geno rejects signing of 38-year-old Jamie Vardy
21:00 07.07.2025
Gaza death toll passes 57,500 as Israeli attacks continue unabated
20:45 07.07.2025
Russian emergencies minister arrives in Baku
20:25 07.07.2025
Trump due to meet Netanyahu at White House
20:15 07.07.2025
Russia attacks recruitment centers in Ukraine's Kharkiv, Zaporizhzhia
20:00 07.07.2025
Pezeshkian says Israel attempted assassination against him
19:45 07.07.2025
Iran has military capability to strike Israel daily for 2 years, IRGC adviser says
19:20 07.07.2025
US envoy says ‘satisfied’ with Lebanese response on roadmap to disarm Hezbollah
19:00 07.07.2025
Peskov: Russia, Azerbaijan should remain close partners, allies
18:45 07.07.2025
The Gulf Observer: Armenians' destruction of Azerbaijan's cultural heritage - vandalism against all humanity
18:30 07.07.2025
Official: Nearly 1M foreigners arrived in Azerbaijan in 5 months of 2025
18:15 07.07.2025
Chief of General Staff of Azerbaijan Army visits Saudi Arabia
18:00 07.07.2025
Israeli PM approved Yemen airstrikes during his flight to US
17:45 07.07.2025
Expert: ECO Summit in Khankendi confirmed member countries' desire for inclusive, multipolar world
17:30 07.07.2025
AZAL introduces new online service
17:15 07.07.2025
Poland imposes checks on German and Lithuanian borders amid migration fears
17:00 07.07.2025
Saudi Arabia raises August oil prices for Asia, Europe buyers
16:45 07.07.2025
EU Reporter: Karabakh region became platform for int'l forums
16:15 07.07.2025
Georgian PM says direct foreign interference in democratic elections failed
16:00 07.07.2025
Typhoon Danas kills two in Taiwan, injures over 500
15:45 07.07.2025
'Coalition of the Willing' may fall apart over Starmer-Macron conflict
15:30 07.07.2025
Former Adjara head hospitalized with gunshot wound in Georgia
15:15 07.07.2025
Scientists reveal how caffeine slows down aging
15:00 07.07.2025
Thailand to offer US more trade concessions to avert 36% tariff
14:45 07.07.2025
Putin dismisses transport minister
14:30 07.07.2025
Israel carries out strikes on Houthi-controlled power station, ports across Yemen
14:15 07.07.2025
Hamısı