With elections for the country’s national assembly less than three months away, South Korean media is awash with accusations and recriminations – all of which stem from the alleged gift of a Dior handbag more than a year ago. Ednews reports referring to The Guardian.

The turmoil began with a meeting between Korean-American pastor Choi Jae-young and Kim Keon Hee, the wife of president Yoon Suk Yeol. Choi has a history of engagement with the North and has visited the communist country several times to conduct prayers at Pyongyang’s handful of state-operated churches.

He says he was motivated by a desire to “share advice” on matters related to unification with the current administration, and so approached first lady Kim, cultivating a relationship with her which culminated in a one-on-one meeting in 2022, just months after her husband became president.

During this meeting, Choi claims that he overheard Kim engaged in a phone conversation which touched upon sensitive state affairs. Alarmed by the nature of the alleged discussion, he decided to secretly record their next meeting, employing a spy camera concealed within a wristwatch.

It was during the course of Choi’s second meeting with Kim that he purportedly presented her with a Dior bag valued at 3 million won ($2,240). Both the bag and the concealed camera were provided by the left-leaning news site Voice of Seoul, which is known for its staunch opposition to the Yoon government.

Voice of Seoul released the video at the end of November. In it, the first lady is seen in discussion with Choi who tells Kim that he’s brought a present, to which she replies “Why do you keep purchasing such items? Please don’t buy such expensive things.” Although the transfer of the Dior bag to Kim is not apparent, it continues to be placed on the table in her presence.

Speaking to foreign media, Choi said he was purely driven by the public’s right to know about alleged corruption. He claims that he messaged Kim in advance, notifying her that he was bringing the bag and that there were no attempts to refuse it or return it later.The potential legal repercussions are ambiguous: anti-graft laws prohibit a public official’s spouse from receiving gifts worth more than 1 million won (US$748) in one sitting, but this must be “in connection with the duties of the public official.”

At the same time, Choi himself is facing criticism from supporters of the president who say the ploy is an attempt to influence the election.

To date, there has been no official statement from the presidential office.

The controversies have proven a headache and a source of embarrassment for her husband. Earlier in January, Yoon vetoed a bill that would have authorised a special investigation into his wife’s alleged involvement in stock manipulation.

With South Korea’s general election scheduled for 10 April, both major political parties are going all out to secure support. Neither party enjoys significant public favour, and both sides are grappling with their own internal power struggles. It’s within this context that the emerging handbag scandal could not have come at a worse time for the country’s deeply unpopular president.

Loyalists of the president have dismissed the bag scandal as a smear campaign. But some members of his ruling People Power party have advocated for an apology and the party’s interim leader, Han Dong-hoon, has acknowledged that the controversy might be “a matter of public concern.”

Tension between Yoon’s office and his party threatened to boil over last week when a senior member likened the situation to the notoriety of Marie Antoinette, the French Queen known for her profligacy.With apparent disagreement on how to handle the problem at the top of the ruling party, the internal disarray came to a head on Sunday, when senior members of Yoon’s office met with Han and suggested he resign. Han refused.

The unfolding drama is not going down well with major conservative media who are typically sympathetic to the president, with the upheaval being described as a potential “risk” for the ruling party in the run-up to the elections.