Yesterday's shelling by Armenian separatists in the direction of Gapanli village of Tartar has raised serious concerns again. According to reports, it happened because the Armenian separatist has been drunk. However, political analysts say the incident has nothing to do with the drunkenness of Armenian soldiers. Because the so-called "plan" "on the liberation of territories", which was put on the agenda of the terrorist regime and was supposed to be executed on February 20, reveals all the facts.
The source said that against the background of this "preparation", the firing of separatist terrorists in the direction of Gapanli is a desire to return to the pre-war situation, to "fight" between the so-called "NKR" and Azerbaijan, which they claim.
The fire, which is said to have been fired from the direction of the former Aghdara, which is currently dwelling to 10,000 separatist terrorists, highlights Article 4 of the violated November 10 agreement. That is, according to the declaration, the Armenian armed forces had to leave the territory of Azerbaijan completely. However, it seems that the issue is still unresolved. Armenians living in Azerbaijan not only do not sit quietly, but also continue their provocations against Azerbaijan.
Military experts think that Armenian separatists still dream and persist about re-occupying the territories. Nevertheless, the reality is that they are far less powerful to make it come true.
"First of all, it should be noted that the firing on Azerbaijani positions, as well as the civilian population living there, is undesirable for us and is extremely negative. The incident that took place yesterday, item 4 is still not fully implemented, and there are still serious shortcomings in the implementation of this item. According to some reports, even Armenians are building new positions and digging trenches under the auspices of Russian peacekeeping troops.
A serviceman, who is currently serving in Azerbaijan, told Ednews. He said it was clear from all the situations that the ceasefire violation was not expedient yesterday.
"It is impossible for this to happen if there is a perfectly armed Azerbaijani army today. In particular, with the exception of the Lachin corridor, these areas are surrounded on all sides by the Azerbaijani army. Another reason is that the weapons left in the hands of the Armenians in the positions there are from the Second Karabakh War. It is impossible to bring new heavy weapons to the area except for cartridges. Shooting can be just an arbitrary step of a pleasant soldier, or it can be a kind of Armenian thought, the principle of "there should always be a sound of gunfire in Karabakh." In other words, it seems that the Armenian society is in an irreconcilable position with the other side over Karabakh, and if the peacekeepers are not there, there may be bloodshed between the parties again.
The expert also touched upon the possible consequences of the fire.
"As for the consequences of the shooting, I can say that there will be no large-scale operations if Russian peacekeepers are there. It is still possible to have small operations, but heavy armed operations are not profitable for Russian peacekeepers. In this case, first of all, the incompetence of the peacekeeping forces will be revealed," the expert said.
"The consequence of the fire on the Azerbaijani side may be that a civilian or a soldier may be killed as a result of the fire," he said. This is completely undesirable. For this, the Azerbaijani side can also take revenge. Such operations have taken place several times before, and the enemy has paid for such mistakes. Let's hope that in the future the enemy will be completely disarmed and such violations will be prevented immediately."
Elnur Enveroglu
